Designing for When AI Gets It Wrong: The UX Layer Every AI Product Needs

AI Builders Global Conference 2026

Date to be announced · Time to be announced

Most AI products are built to handle the case when the AI is right. The hard part is designing for when it's not. I'm a UX designer at Bevaya, an AI-powered insurance automation platform. My job is to design the screen where trained reviewers catch, correct, and override AI extractions in real time, at volume, under time pressure, with real liability. That screen is the last line of defense between a hallucinated field value and a bad insurance decision. Over the past year I've learned things about designing for human-AI collaboration that I couldn't have learned anywhere else. Show the AI output even when it's wrong, blank fields are harder to correct than bad ones. Confidence signals work, but the moment you show a percentage you lose the reviewer's trust. Hard stops before submission feel safe but kill throughput at scale. The document is evidence; the extracted data is the work. These aren't UX opinions. They're decisions we made, broke, and remade with real reviewers on real workflows. If you're building an AI product, at some point your users will need to catch what your model missed. This talk is about what happens in that moment, and what the UX of that experience determines about whether people trust your product or abandon it.

Session status: scheduled

Track: AI Industry Applications & Vertical Solutions

Level: Intermediate

Official session / agenda

Saving a session is not registration. Check the official agenda for availability, eligibility and any additional fees.

Speakers and their event affiliations

Parent event

Virtual · Online event

This describes the parent event. Confirm the session’s attendance requirements with the organizer.

Companies participating in the parent event

These are event-level relationships, not confirmed sponsorship of this session.

Showing 24 of 209 company relationships. View all on the event page.